Adapting a community pharmacy intervention to improve medication safety.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies are an ideal location to address challenges of over-the-counter medication safety, yet many successful interventions are only tested in a few pharmacies without expansion, creating unrealized opportunities to improve patient care on a larger scale. Scaling up to numerous pharmacies can be challenging because each community pharmacy has unique needs and layouts and requires individualized adaptation. OBJECTIVES: This paper reports techniques for (a) adapting a community pharmacy intervention to fit the unique physical layout and patient needs of health system pharmacy sites without increasing staff workload, (b) identifying strategies to gather feedback on adaptations from stakeholders, and (c) developing materials to share with pharmacy champions for them to independently implement and sustain the intervention in their organization. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: The study team collaborated with Aurora Pharmacy, Inc to develop an intervention designed to increase awareness of safe over-the-counter medication use for older adults. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Senior Safe, a community pharmacy-based intervention, was designed, implemented, and tested using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment implementation framework. EVALUATION METHODS: Senior Safe was adapted through pilot testing and a randomized control trial. Feedback was collected from key stakeholders, including pharmacy staff, older adults, and a research advisory group. RESULTS: A finalized version of Senior Safe, as well as an implementation package, was provided to Aurora Pharmacy to integrate into all 63 sites. CONCLUSION: This multiphase study illustrated that refining an intervention is possible and welcomed by pharmacy staff, but it requires time, resources, and funds to create an impactful, sustainable community pharmacy intervention.

Unmet Supportive Care Needs Among Cancer Patients in Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Mixed Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Supportive cancer care is vital to reducing the current disparities in cancer outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including poor survival and low quality of life, and ultimately achieving equity in cancer care. This is the first review aimed to evaluate the extent of unmet supportive care needs and identify their contributing factors among patients with cancer in SSA. METHODS: Six electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, Medline [Ovid], PsycINFO, PubMed, and Cochrane Library of Databases] were systematically searched. Studies that addressed one or more domains of unmet supportive cancer care needs were included. Findings were analyzed using narrative analysis and meta-analysis, as appropriate. RESULT: Eleven articles out of 2732 were retained in the review. The pooled prevalence of perceived unmet need for cancer care in SSA was 63% (95% CI: 45, 81) for physical, 59% (95% CI: 45, 72) for health information and system, 58% (95% CI: 42, 74) for psychological, 44% (95% CI: 29, 59) for patient care and support, and 43% (95% CI: 23, 63) for sexual. Older age, female sex, rural residence, advanced cancer stage, and low access to health information were related to high rates of multiple unmet needs within supportive care domains. CONCLUSION: In SSA, optimal cancer care provision was low, up to two-thirds of patients reported unmet needs for one or more domains. Strengthening efforts to develop comprehensive and integrated systems for supportive care services are keys to improving the clinical outcome, survival, and quality of life of cancer patients in SSA.

Utilidad de la consulta electrónica entre los centros de atención primaria y el Servicio de Reumatología de un hospital terciario / Usefulness of an electronic consultation system between primary care health centres and the rheumatology department of a tertiary hospital

Introducción y objetivo: Las enfermedades reumáticas representan casi el 30% de las consultas atendidas en los centros de atención primaria españoles. El objetivo principal fue analizar la demanda de consultas reumatológicas desde atención primaria y su resolución mediante el sistema de consulta electrónica. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de las consultas electrónicas procedentes de los centros de atención primaria del área sanitaria al Servicio de Reumatología de un hospital terciario, entre los meses de julio de 2020 y mayo de 2021. Resultados: Se recogieron las últimas 500 consultas consecutivas. La media de edad de los pacientes fue 59 años; el 74% eran mujeres. Los principales motivos de consulta fueron la osteoporosis y el tratamiento de pacientes en seguimiento por el servicio por artritis reumatoide y espondiloartritis. El tiempo medio de respuesta fue de dos días; el 57% necesitaron ser citados en consulta externa. Discusión: La consulta electrónica permitió resolver, en una media de dos días, las consultas del 42,6% de los pacientes.(AU)

Background and objective: Rheumatic diseases account for almost 30% of consultations attended in Spanish primary care centres. The main objective was to analyse the demand for rheumatology consultations from Primary Care and their resolution using the electronic consultation system. Patients and methods: Retrospective descriptive study of electronic consultations from primary care centres in the health area to the Rheumatology service of a tertiary hospital, between July 2020 and May 2021. Results: The last 500 consecutive consultations were collected. Mean age of patients was 59.5 years; 74.2% were women. Main reasons for consultation were osteoporosis and treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis under follow-up by the department. Mean response time was 2 days. Fifty-seven per cent of patients required outpatient appointments. Discussion: Over 40% of queries were resolved thanks to the electronic consultation system in an average of 2 days, otherwise patients would have been referred to specialized care.(AU)

De la consulta presencial a la teleconsulta: experiencias de profesionales de atención primaria del País Vasco durante la pandemia / From face-to-face consultation to teleconsultation: Primary health care professionals’ experiences in the Basque Country during the pandemic

Objetivo: Explorar las percepciones de profesionales de Atención Primaria (AP) sobre los cambios en las modalidades de consulta y su impacto en los fundamentos de la AP durante la pandemia. Diseño: Investigación cualitativa de diseño exploratorio realizada entre octubre y noviembre de 2021. Emplazamiento: Cuatro centros de salud urbanos y uno rural con diferente perfil socioeconómico en los tresterritorios del País Vasco. Participantes: Cuarenta y seis profesionales de distintas categorías del equipo de AP y directores/as de centros de salud.Método: Muestreo intencional. Cinco grupos focales y cuatroentrevistas en profundidad. Análisis temático con apoyo del programa Atlas.Ti. Triangulación de los resultados entre el equipo investigador. Resultados: Las vivencias sobre el desarrollo de la teleconsulta aparecen directamente condicionadas por el contexto pandémico en sus diferentes fases y por la situación de la AP. Los y las profesionales identificaron barreras comunicacionales, así como potencialidades de su uso que requieren de formación y evaluación adecuadas. Se percibieron riesgos de inequidad en la utilización de las teleconsultas que podrían estar afectando a la calidad asistencial. La longitudinalidad se valoró como un factor facilitador y se identificaron problemas en la coordinación y comunicación mediante teleconsulta entre niveles asistenciales. Conclusiones: La sustitución de la consulta presencial por la teleconsulta tuvo impacto en aspectos fundamentales de la AP como la calidad, accesibilidad, equidad, coordinación y longitudinalidad. La teleconsulta en AP requiere siempre ser evaluada considerando las circunstancias y los contextos concretos de su implementación

Objective: To explore the perceptions of Primary Health Care (PHC) professionals on changes in consultation modalities and their impact on PHC fundamentals during the pandemic. Design: Qualitative exploratory research conducted between October and November, 2021. Location: Four urban and one rural primary health care centers with different socioeconomic profiles in the threeterritories of the Basque Country. Participants: Forty-six professionals from different categories of the PHC team and health centre directors.Method: Purposive sampling. Five focus groups and fourin-depth interviews. Thematic analysis with the support of the Atlas.ti programme. Triangulation of results among the research team. Results: Experiences with the development of teleconsultation appear to be directly conditioned by the pandemic context in its different phases and by the PC situation. The professionals identified communication barriers, as well as potentialities of its use that require adequate training and evaluation. Risks of inequity were perceived in the use of teleconsultations that could be affecting the quality of care. Longitudinality was assessed as a facilitating factor and problems of coordination and communication through teleconsultation between care levels were identified. Conclusions: The replacement of face-to-face consultation by teleconsultation had an impact on fundamental aspects of PHC such as quality, accessibility, equity, coordination and longitudinality. Teleconsultation in PHC should always be evaluated considering the specific circumstances and contexts of its implementation.(AU)

Aplicación de las nuevas tecnologías en Atención Primaria en el control del paciente con sobrepeso u obesidad y factores de riesgo cardiovascular / Application of new technologies in Primary Care to monitor overweight or obese patients with cardiovascular risk factor

El objetivo es evaluar un seguimiento telemático (web o aplicación [app]) para pacientes con sobrepeso/obesidad y otros dos factores de riesgo cardiovascular: hipertensión arterial (HTA), dislipemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), sedentarismo, consumo tabáquico. Diseño: es un estudio de intervención con asignación aleatoria al grupo intervención (web o app) y al grupo control. Emplazamiento: centros de salud rurales y urbanos, docentes y no docentes, del Sector Zaragoza I. Participantes: 261 personas con índice de masa corporal (IMC) > 25 kg/m2 y otros dos factores de riesgo. Intervenciones: seguimiento de 18 meses con puntos de corte al inicio, 1, 6, 12 y 18 meses. Las mediciones principales son peso, tensión arterial, consumo tabáquico, eventos cardiovasculares, calidad de vida y bioquímica. Resultados: el grupo control finalizó el estudio en mayor proporción (79% versus 14%). El grupo control consiguió una pérdida del 8% de la mediana de peso al año y el grupo intervención un 5%. A los 6 meses, el grupo control logró disminuir el 7% la tensión arterial sistólica y el 5% la diastólica. La hemoglobina glicosilada (HbA1c) descendió un 1% en el grupo control y un 0,5% en el grupo intervención (test de Wilcoxon: 10; p = 0,089). El colesterol de lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL) del grupo control descendió 9 mg/dL, y el del grupo intervención, 7 mg/dl (test de Wilcoxon: 1.089; p = 0,018). El hábito tabáquico disminuyó en todos los grupos (test de Wilcoxon: 21; p = 0,036). El grupo control presentó mayor prevalencia de eventos cardiovasculares. La calidad de vida mejoró en todos los grupos (test Wilcoxon: 979; p = 0,041). Conclusiones: las/los pacientes que acuden al centro de salud para un seguimiento de peso consiguen mejores resultados que si el seguimiento se hace de forma telemática.(AU)

The aim was to evaluate remote assistance (Web or App) for overweight/obese patients with two extra cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, sedentary lifestyle. Design: intervention study using random assignment for Web Group and App Group. The App Group was subsequently selected. Location: urban and rural health centres, teaching and non-teaching centres, in the Zaragoza I health area. Subjects: 261 people with BMI> 25 Kg/m2 and two extra cardiovascular risk factors. Interventions: 18 months follow up, initial checkups and after 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. The primary endpoints were: weight, blood pressure, tobacco consumption, cardiovascular events, quality of life and blood tests. Results: The control group completed the study in a higher proportion (79% vs 14%). The control and intervention groups attained a loss of 8% in and 5% median weight per year, respectively. After 6 months, the control group managed to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 7% and 5%, respectively. Glycosidic haemoglobin was 1% and 0.5% lower in the control and intervention groups, respectively (Wilcoxon Test=10; P= 0.089). Both groups reduced tobacco consumption (Wilcoxon=21; P=0.03). The control group had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular events. Quality of life improved (Wilcoxon Test=979; P=0.041). Conclusion: Patients visiting health centres to monitor weight obtain better results than those remotely assisted.(AU)

Caring for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Summary of the 2023 ESICM Practice Guidelines.

This article summarizes the 2023 updated ARDS guidelines from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, including the guidelines' methods, findings, and implications, along with reflections on next steps.

Love Your Patient as Yourself: On Reviving the Broken Heart of American Medical Ethics.

This article presents a radical claim: American medical ethics is broken, and it needs love to be healed. Due to a unique set of cultural and economic pressures, American medical ethics has adopted a mechanistic mode of ethical reasoning epitomized by the doctrine of principlism. This mode of reasoning divorces clinicians from both their patients and themselves. This results in clinicians who can ace ethics questions on multiple-choice tests but who fail either to recognize a patient's humanity or to navigate the ethical quandaries into which they are frequently thrown. Drawing on personal experience as well as the philosophical work of Augustine of Hippo, Simone Weil, and Iris Murdoch, we propose a novel ethical approach grounded in a conception of neighbor love, specifically, the virtue of love understood as attention to a sufferer's humanity. We conclude with five practical recommendations for reimagining medical ethics education oriented around the virtue of love.

The Binary Order of Things: A Discursive Study of Nursing Students' Talk on Providing, and Learning About, LGBT Patient Care.

Against the backdrop of the healthcare inequities and maltreatment facing LGBT patients, recommendations have been made for the inclusion of LGBT health topics in nursing curricula. Based on data collected in focus group discussions with South African nursing students, we complicate the assumption that training focused on health-specific knowledge will effectively reform providers' prejudicial practices. Findings reveal ambivalence: silence and discrimination versus inclusive humanism. Participants drew on discourses of ignorance, religion, and egalitarian treatment to justify their inadequacy regarding LGBT patients; while doing so, however, they deployed othering discourses in which homophobic and transphobic disregard is rendered acceptable, and "scientifically" supported through binary, deterministic views of sexuality and gender. Such "expert" views accord with Foucault's notion of "grotesque discourse." We conclude with a discussion of the findings' implications for nursing education; we call for the recognition and teaching of binary ideology as a form of discursive violence over LGBT lives.

Validación de instrumento para medir calidad percibida de los servicios de enfermería en el contexto hospitalario / Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Perceived Quality of Nursing Care in the Hospital Context

Introducción: La calidad de atención de Enfermería no se puede resumir en aspectos técnicos mecanizados, pues implica cuidado humano, que sustenta la necesidad evaluarla desde la percepción del sujeto. Objetivo: Validar un instrumento para medir la calidad percibida de los servicios de Enfermería en el contexto hospitalario. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio instrumental, en los servicios de hospitalización del Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico "Hermanos Ameijeiras", La Habana, Cuba, en el período de enero a julio de 2021. Participaron nueve expertos, 15 jueces, 30 pacientes y 10 profesionales de la Enfermería del área de hospitalización. Se emplearon la revisión documental, el grupo focal, el método Delphi y la prueba piloto. Como métodos estadísticos se emplearon los coeficientes de V de Aiken y Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados: El instrumento quedó conformado por tres dimensiones: Componente Técnico (24 indicadores); Componente Interpersonal (17 indicadores); Confort (7 indicadores). El consenso entre los expertos, determinado por el Coeficiente de Concordancia, resultó igual al 100 por ciento. El índice de coeficiente de V de Aiken, estuvo en todos los ítems por encima de 0,9 y global de 0,97. El coeficiente de alfa de Cronbach alcanzó resultados superiores a 0,9 en cada ítem y 0,96 global. Conclusiones: El estudio permitió validar un instrumento para medir la calidad percibida de los servicios de Enfermería en el contexto hospitalario. El instrumento alcanzó una buena validez de contenido, alta fiabilidad y consistencia(AU)

Introduction: The quality of nursing care cannot be summarized based on mechanized technical aspects, since it implies human care, which is supported by the need to assess it focusing on the subject's perception. Objective: To validate an instrument to measure the perceived quality of nursing services in the hospital context. Methods: An instrumental study was carried out in the hospitalization services of Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras, in Havana, Cuba, in the period from January to July 2021, with the participation of 9 experts, 15 judges, 30 patients and 10 nursing professionals from the hospitalization area. Documentary review, focus group, the Delphi method and the pilot test were used. Aiken's V and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used as statistical methods. Results: The instrument consisted of three dimensions: technical component (24 indicators, interpersonal component (17 indicators), and comfort (7 indicators). The consensus among the experts, determined by the concordance coefficient, was equal to 100 por ciento. The Aiken's V coefficient index was above 0.9 for all items, while the global one was 0.97. Cronbach's alpha coefficient reached results above 0.9 in each item, while the global one was 0.96. Conclusions: The study allowed to validate an instrument for measuring the perceived quality of nursing services in the hospital context. The instrument achieved good content validity, high reliability and consistency(AU)